Just know that they will ALL require you to have some skin in the game, some more than others, that's just based on how much risk each one is willing to take.  

The first bank turned me down after the loan committee decided they wanted me to have more skin in the game.

I suppose some of us are as little more thin skinned than others.

Now, I don't like irritating my conservative friends, but you can't stick your heads in the sand on this for long.

Investors who use their contracts, perhaps their notes may well have liability in doing a seller financed transaction, it's not just the skin of the note holder at risk if you introduced and presented the deal convincing the seller to act illegally.

I'd like to see it dip down again and I will put some skin in the game.

Rich, being in a similar boat I agree with all of your conditions, especially the skin in the game requirement, otherwise it's not really a partnership!

If you control the property and have skin in the game then you should make that.I think overall we agree, just coming at it at different angles.

They want investors to have more skin in the game.

Those who, due to ignorance,  say things cannot be done irritate me.)