To be honest, I've only found that economical with individual loan amounts over $350k or so.

Judges can also determine how the eviction will affect the family’s education (kids in school) or the tenant’s health and base his or her decision with that information.

And if you intend to tear down your house, it might be more economical, efficient, and less environmental impact if you "order" a home and have it delivered and put on the property.2) I've heard that Greenwich has been in a housing slump.

I can’t imagine that would be economical.

Strictly from an economic perspective, It's an underserved market, irrespective of one's political views on the topic.

Due to the economic problems we are having in the country,do you guys feel the national trends tell the story for most of the cities,or do you believe that some individual markets may have good job growth in their future?

Find the pain and heal the wounds!

But if there were extenuating circumstances, such a death, divorce, health issues, etc..., then a deeper look wouldn't hurt.

I am a part time investor as well as an economic analyst.

You'd not only have to replace your spendable income, (after tax, so start with your gross income), but then you'd have to replace your benefits, health insurance, contributions to IRA/401(k), etc.