(no offense REA folks) Investors are often 'harmed' by the actions of an appraiser.

Thank you for the detailed input Laura.Wayne I don't feel I am putting anyone in harms way but you are entitled to your opinion.

@Sam Leon , my understanding is that Drano does not harm pipes, whether copper or otherwise.

Enforcement of any regulation by any regulator is at a level of discretion, how serious is the infraction, is there financial harm or potential of harm, is there a public benefit served, if none of these issues are present and both parties are smiling, it might be a cease and desist letter, hand slap and you'll be told to go get it fixed.

A determination that an assistance animal poses a direct threat of harm to others or would cause substantial physical damage to the property of others must be based on an individualized assessment that relies on objective evidence about the specific animal's actual conduct — not on mere speculation or fear about the types of harm or damage an animal may cause and not on evidence about harm or damage that other animals have caused.However, according to the Pet Ownership for the Elderly and Persons With Disabilities final rule by HUD you do not have to make an accommodation if the dog "pose[s] an undue financial and administrative burden."

I agree that such provisions can cause more harm and problems than good and in the long run, could cost the landlord more money rather than less.

It will do more harm than good.

No one harmed but the bugs themselves and extremely cheap.

Any time something fails a Full Disclosure Test, it is not a good idea and can lead to harm.

Haven't heard anything back yet but either way, no harm no foul.PS - thanks Bill, very informative