I know I have more questions but I've drawn a blank...

It doesn't just skip 6 payments and tack it on at the end.When asking questions - ensure you're asking them of people who are knowledgeable in what you are asking.

Then you ask, "Why would I hop on a forum and spend my free time answering your question if it wasn't to help?"

I have more than enough net worth and global cashflow to cover a gap, however because most of my net worth is in collateralized real estate, I cannot directly access by say cashout refinance. 

My question is, should I wait until end of next year to invest, assuming capital and all is aligned by early 2025, or invest in property while simultaneously paying my own rent elsewhere?

There really is no such thing as anonymity anymore, especially in real estate unless you have 8 or 9 figures to work with.

Just because someone has a real estate license doesn't mean they know how to properly screen.I'm surprised dual representation is even allowed.

This is a common question among real estate owners.Let's dive in:The reality is that wealthy families often pass on real estate assets from generation to generation.For example, if one generation has an RE entrepreneur who amasses $50 million worth of real estate, that portfolio can generate enough cash flow to support multiple future generations comfortably when passed on.So, what happens if that initial investor built their empire by rapidly depreciating assets and using 1031 exchanges to lower the basis and defer taxes along the way?

It reasonably allows us to forecast the combination of traditional W2 earnings + a growing real estate portfolio and model out corresponding tax considerations. 

Per your question: if paying the same amount over a year but the question is to pay a lump sum at the end or in bi-weekly payments, definitely better for bi-weekly as you'll save interest expense.