id=58900, page 6.)You may be able to create your own notice, but if you do be careful that it satisfies all of the legal requirements for this particular type of notice. 

., former employer 401k) to a solo 401k are not reported on Form 5498, but rather on Form 5500-EZ, but only if the air market value of the solo 401k exceeds $250K as of the end of the plan year (generally 12/31);When funds are rolled over or transferred from an IRA or 401k to a self-directed IRA, the amount deposited into the self-directed IRA is reported on Form 5498 by the receiving self-directed IRA custodian by May of the year following the rollover/transfer.Rollovers (provided the 60 day rollover window is satisfied) from an IRA to a Solo 401k or self-directed IRA are reported on lines 15a and 15b of Form 1040;Pre-tax IRA contributions on reported on line 32 of Form 1040;Pre-tax solo 401k contributions are reported on line 28 of Form 1040;Roth solo 401k funds are subject to RMDs;A Roth 401k may be transferred to a Roth IRA (Note that from a planning perspective, it may be advantageous to transfer Roth Solo 401k funds to a Roth IRA before turning age 70 ½ in order to escape the Roth RMD requirement applicable to Roth 401k contributions including Roth Solo 401k contributions and earnings.)

Hi RichIn order to pull off a wholesale contract flip you will probably need a POF (Proof of Funds) to satisfy the seller that you are for real.

Does an offer satisfy the identification requirement for the 45 day timeline?

If you are short on cash - you may want to assign a few properties firs.I like Hampden - great place - you can still some bargains there - but you need to really to look of looking.Look at the stats on any property that is listed - most all are over-price - sometimes due to the agent's recommendations - forget the price tag - it is up to you as an investor to make an offer that will satisfy your financial needs - We say if they don't cry - your offer is too high! 

I would come up with a plan, share it with them, implement it and hope they're satisfied.

This burden is satisfied by presenting evidence proving that the challenged practice actually or predictably results in a disparate impact.

Would you not have to put that amount down to satisfy the HML? 

I found myself in a situation where I was not satisfied with my PM.

Even if these judgments never get satisfied in the majority of cases, im sure it will be a higher percentage of money owed to owners being paid than it is now.