I think the city government is fully behind facilitating population growth.

In my opinion, if I can't get a 10% return on a rental property, I would rather put my money in a good growth stock with no hassles.

Per our research the best markets to find deals under 100K are in cities with minimal population growth. 

With U of R growing exponentially, the announcement of photonics institute, and the growth of surrounding suburbs, investors have found some great cash flow and appreciating properties. 

In hot markets like this, the only way to find a deal is highly specialized knowledge like knowing the path of growth, land use and zoning and knowing block by block in a neighborhood.As a realtor with a team of 8 agents at Keller Williams, I don't think I am biased when I say that 99% of agents don't understand investing.

Living solely off your business is going to hamper the exponential growth that your money is capable of.

You mention nearby growth/development...any details?  

I love finding properties, getting the work done, finding a tenant, etc...so I am passionate about real estate but I'm also passionate about investing wisely and seeing my money grow the best way possible.I guess being a yopung investor I just want to hear that I'm doing the right thing from more experienced investors...and if I'm not, advice as to a better route to take.

I've been in the corporate rat race long enough with mediocre growth despite being damn good at what I do (not to toot my own horn).

Where there is potential for appreciation and growth.