(Everyone should know this is incorrect) The Alabama Senate will very likely pass this Bill and this Bill may impact individual counties is yet to be seen, HB 354 2018ENGROSSED A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACTRelating to tax lien sales; to amend Sections 40-10-180, 40-10-181, 40-10-182, 40-10-183, 40-10-184, 40-10-185, 40-10-186, 40-10-187, 40-10-188, 40-10-189, 40-10-190, 40-10-191, 40-10-192, 40-10-193, 40-10-194, 40-10-195, 40-10-196, 40-10-197, and 40-10-198, Code of Alabama 1975; to add Sections 40-10-199 and 40-10-200 to the Code of Alabama 1975; to provide an auction process for the sale of tax liens; to provide for counties to issue tax lien certificates for certain fees on the lands which have been sold at certain sales to individuals; to prescribe the significance of and authority associated with a tax lien certificate; to provide for payment of taxes on lands purchased at tax lien sales by holders of tax lien certificates; to provide for distribution of monies received from tax lien sales and to provide for certain redemption procedures including a procedure to allow the holder of a tax lien certificate to foreclose redemption rights after a period of time; and in connection therewith would have as its purpose or effect the requirement of a new or increased expenditure of local funds within the meaning of Amendment 621 of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, now appearing as Section 111.05 of the Official Recompilation of the Constitution of Alabama of 1901, as amended.BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ALABAMA:Section 1.

If the tenant remained in the property, I would argue that it didn't constitute a habitability issue but I'm not sure how a judge would see it.

Like Elizabeth said, in Ohio anything held in security over what constitutes one month's rent requires interest to be accrued and paid.

You also need to conform to your municipality's local zoning definitions for what constitutes "single family residential" zoning.

A real estate agent / brokerage trade or business doesn't constitute a 'specified service trade or business' under IRC Sec 199A.Best to talk to an attorney for the legal perspective, a tax CPA/EA for the tax perspective.You have Disregarded Entity, C Corp, or S Corp at your disposal for tax, assuming you're the 100% owner.

Unfortunately, it was already ruled illegal in July by the US Supreme Court and our "leader" decided to ignore the Constitution and extend it again.

To discontinue the credit restoration program constitutes a material breach of the contract.

Apparently the tenants won on the grounds that requiring a tenant to waive constitutional rights as a stipulation to renting is illegal.So I would discuss with the prospective tenant how they secure the weapons, and as long as they have a thought out logical method of a safe, locked cases ect would have no problem with it, and would absolutely keep that information between myself and the tenant.

And the Feds have no constitutional authority to regulate commerce that is not interstate commerce.

I was told by a lawyer that means that if they bring me someone who's "equally qualified" on paper and I say no, that would constitute unreasonable withholding and might cross over into discrimination.