Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
Results (927)
Joshua Dorkin Rich Dad Poor Dad by Robert T. Kiyosaki
13 March 2008 | 36 replies
I still though he put it simplistically which is a great way to drive stuff into your head.The stories, the motivation and conviction he speaks with is great to see.
N/A N/A Book reveiw: Find it, Fix it, Flip it!
1 June 2007 | 7 replies
It has some great outlines and makes formulas very simplistic.
Jordan Powell Buying townhomes from multiple owners?
23 December 2013 | 4 replies
. :)It struck me that owning and thus controlling three of three physically conjoined properties—not merely "close together" properties, but wall-sharing—might present some benefits (similar to owning all of one color in Monopoly, though I'm sure that's too simplistic of an example).
Aaron Westerburg What's the best way to invest $50k?
9 January 2014 | 13 replies
Leverage.The who what when where why and how can be argued and go round and round all day but the fact is hands down the best investment for 50K is a leveraged investment, find your maximum leverage.I know it sounds simplistic, almost too simplistic, but too many get lost in all the banter of how and forget the fundamentals and end the day in a deal that "was supposed to" have xyz returns, but was never a leveraged deal.If that were all I had and would ever have........
Gary West Need Financial Math Guru to Help Set Goals
13 March 2014 | 42 replies
Originally posted by Gary West:I know a lot of people share your view point, but I just dont understand how a portion of money is better than ALL of the money.That's a very simplistic way to look at it.Just because you're earning 100% of the NOI on a few properties doesn't mean you're getting ALL the money.
William Morgan Does this qualify as "Consideration"?
6 June 2013 | 7 replies
In my simplistic view, the seller is giving the buyer a piece of real estate in exchange for some amount of money.
Tom Goans Lose Your Competitive Edge With Debt
29 June 2013 | 64 replies
I'm not necessarily advocating any debt.All I'm saying is that the original post in this thread is overly simplistic, as are many of the comments above.
Wayne Woodson Showing REO's That Have A Lock Box
31 July 2013 | 18 replies
That's a tremendously simplistic view of economics, and from an accounting standpoint, won't get you very far...
Al Williamson If Steve Jobs was a Landlord - iHousing
13 June 2012 | 26 replies
Well, most definitely he would consider making the house very high-tech yet simplistic in appearance which brings out the style in itself much like the other Apple Products.
Chris LoSapio (Another) Potential First Deal
17 October 2012 | 5 replies
My simplistic analysis would be:$550 x 2 units = gross rents of $1100less 50% for vacancy, capital and expenses gives NOI of $550I get $302 for a payment on $50,400 at 6% for 30 years.That gives cash flow of $248 a month or $2974 a yearCash on cash return of 24%.Your estimate is lower.