Right now from a lender's perspective we have floor rates at 7.5 for 30 Year FRM.

From a tax perspective, it would be better to have one spouse without a W-2 income that has real estate professional status.

The black and white modern farmhouse styled mobile home is freshly painted outside and pops with a Caribbean blue double door that opens up to a spacious 1100 sq ft of interior living space.

There's a pretty clear value-add to ADU construction on multi-family from a cash flow perspective, but I'm certainly concerned about the ability to refi post-construction or get the right valuation on an exit.

So I am wondering from the perspective of the person who purchased the tax lien certificate (I'm assuming someone purchased it): do they not get paid there money back plus interest in this case?

Really does not make sense at all for them to be allowed to run the Austin REIA but I am guessing the folks at the national level look the other way to this because they bring in fresh money.

I think the property has been freshly renovated.

The regulations are written from the perspective of the landlord making the violation, so I wonder if there is different treatment if the tenant is the one who does the violation.

Here are some blog posts with various perspectives:* "The Pros and Cons of Accepting Section 8 Housing"* "Should I Accept Section 8 Tenants—Or Run the Other Way?"

This worries me a bit, granted they are not in the same playing field in terms of layout and build materials as the RTR build, but it does concern me that from a numbers perspective, there are several homes in the area for sale at substantially less than the estimated $380k valuations.