Feel free to pull up the examples that the tax administrator provides for making that determination, and you will see that the circus rubber man couldn't bend his way around that one. 

The judge signs a Domestic Relations Order and then the qualified plan administrator makes it Qualified (that is, it meets ERISA standards to be a QDRO).There is nothing in the IRS regulations or the DOL rules (who administer ERISA) that mandate QDROs are only for divorce.

All "quality of life" offenses (drinking in public, public urination, aggressive panhandling, graffiti, vandalism, trespassing, loitering for the purpose of engaging in drug sales etc.)

You can take participant loans from the plan, you don't need the additional expense and administration of an LLC to have checkbook control, and there is a built in-Roth component.

I have a biased opinion as I'm a CRM Business Analyst and Administrator. 

Mine was reluctantly taking on a tenant that was a former drug addict .

Now I'm not familiar with residential construction but in my field (healthcare, educational, industrial building design) we use about 1.5-2.5% of the construction budget on construction administration, which would be overseeing the GC and coordinating with owners (investors in this case), documentation, etc.

Also, you’d be better off picking up a drug habit than invest with Morris invest.

In this instance, the U.S.A. child would pay U.S.A. taxes on all income, but the retained earnings would remain in the child company until you explicitly repatriated them to the parent (and there is preferential treatment under the tax treaty for dividends from a child to parent).Keep in mind, the more companies and the more complex your business the more administrative overhead (sets of books, tax filings, corporate filings, etc) you will incur.  

Although we haven't seen any information on this yet, I'd bet that those states that don't recognize the series LLC might just ask for a registration fee for each series, as what government entity can turn down an opportunity to squeeze more administrative fees from the people?