![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/725489/small_1621496166-avatar-jorgel16.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
10 March 2021 | 15 replies
For the record, more or less the same thing came up for the last few years and got defeated every time.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2123057/small_1661391541-avatar-miguelo44.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
31 August 2022 | 12 replies
Yes, you can have a non-occupant co-borrower on an FHA multi-unit, but you'll need to put 25% down in order to do that, which kind of defeats the purpose of house hacking.
9 April 2021 | 3 replies
— most offices are inspected for this.3) Fair Housing and Liability - if the report is shared with you before the approval/decline you are opening up your agent and you into a world of liabilities - which quite honestly defeats one of the benefits of hiring a licensed RE pro to begin with.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/805132/small_1695102705-avatar-elliotf6.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
17 April 2021 | 4 replies
Thus defeating the whole purpose of the game.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/1405658/small_1621511986-avatar-stephenr165.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 April 2021 | 23 replies
Both decisions could be wrong.I laid out the whole scenario about how it can actually work against the investors as well as how sponsors can completely defeat the supposed benefits in “The Hands-Off Investor”.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/317527/small_1621443807-avatar-akira7799.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 April 2021 | 11 replies
There is no vague "involved with passive income" out-of-state exception to this to my knowledge.There are still multiple ways to hide corporate identity and defeat a simple lookup.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/400510/small_1621449226-avatar-pistolpete1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
23 April 2021 | 2 replies
If we bought homes as investments, we would end up living somewhere we don't want to all the time and doesn't that defeat the purpose of investing.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/709370/small_1694598563-avatar-patrickm146.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
8 February 2022 | 9 replies
*Nevertheless, there are certainly times when it is fruitless to engage further, and had this persisted I would have had sufficient ammunition to defeat any challenge to discrimination.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/636216/small_1621494339-avatar-benjaminf16.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 May 2021 | 12 replies
The reason there were 3 votes at the Board of Supervisors for this issue is because Terra Lawson-Remer defeated Kristin Gaspar last November.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/2413656/small_1694874795-avatar-courtneyw80.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 March 2022 | 4 replies
1) if the MLO has any inkling the borrower may payoff the loan or sell the property in 6 months - they should avoid using any srp pricing and explain to the borrower as to why ( of course - this likely defeats the benefit to the borrower for doing the loan ) 2) if the borrower has some control of the timing on paying off a loan ( aka - they sell another property and have cash to use to payoff the loan ) ...and the MLO becomes aware ......ask the borrower to delay paying it off ( if possible ) until after the EPO 3) Do answer the prepayment pen question the way you describe 4) the EPO that come out of the blue especially when a recent loan is refinanced by another company are the worst ones to deal with and unfortunately there isnt anything that can be done to avoid these situations fyi - most epo periods are approx 6 months but there are some that are slightly different in timelines ..eg. 6 months from 1st pmt due date ....6 months from when servicing is first sold ...etc