The rest of the house was functional, so there's no point in putting them up in a hotel.In your case, the tenants couldn't use the toilet for one day.

This is a function of the flexibility in a UL policy, not any kind of inherent risk, But agents who don't understand this try to paint the whole industry with a broad brush.

To own High income producing property with short term tenants with an option function like a long term for a period.

But not married to any location ;)  I agree with Brandon Turner's admonition to live where you want, invest where makes sense.Investing locally -- in addition to the temptation to drive by, sink time -- can come with a cognitive bias of thinking we know more about our environs, including material aspects, than we might.

The search functions on a lot of real estate sites could really use an upgrade - an accessory apartment requiring the owner to live on the property should be a separate category box that can be checked, but I've never seen this anywhere. 

They are not allowed to have five guide dogs because one dog performs the necessary function.

As long as the roof still serves its functional purpose, meaning there are no significant leaks, and isn't completely damaged, then more often than not you should be in the clear.

I would say look at the areas just outside the major metropolitan areas in Texas.Cash flow is often a function of how much you put down, so I would put down here about 30-40% so that you can get cash flow.There are some decent newer single family properties about $225,000 or so 3bed 2bath 1car port or 1 car garage.

Here is the scenario:The renter reported an incident from earlier in the day. " I went to back up and did not realize the garage was open 3/4 of the way. ( I am assuming it stopped due to being too cold). that said my car hit it and so my husband called a repair guy and he came out and fixed it to be functional.

How are you at functioning with little or no sleep?