Most lenders want to see the borrower have some "skin in the game" .. that is some of their own money so if something goes bad, the borrower won't just walk away.Most sellers or anyone else holding a second mortgage on this property will probably want something more than small interest.

I'd have no "skin in the game" besides the contract is new the full amt etc. do lenders work it people like this or is it like traditional loans where u must have a certain percentage to put down?

Don't get excited there is only 1 that I saw and it is a duplex in Lawrence.Though it did look to be in decent shape and have 4/1 units for a list of like $209K.If your skin is thick enough you can probably get like $1300 in rent for the other unit.

If you want to be taken seriously though usually you have to put more skin in the game than that.

does the resident need the accommodation or modification requested in order to have the same opportunity that a non-disabled individual has to use and enjoy the the apartment or community" The wording sets up the "therapist" to have some skin in the game if they say "yes" on this form as it relates to an ESA.

It would cost $11,171 dollars for the hard money loan, in addition to my 'skin' of $25k.

She could have paid more than the “minimum”  to bring her balance and interest charges down, at any time. 

No skin in the game?  

They have ZERO skin in the game.

If the wholesaler isn't going to put skin in the game for the seller then the seller shouldn't give an exclusive for their property to a wholesaler trying to assign and make a fee.