@William Dorough Your first line of defense is to carry adequate insurance on your properties.

This structure helps thwart the lawsuit before its filed.Also, insurances are a good first line of defense, but aren't a good enough defense for me to rely on exclusively.

In defense of things that are found on this page about this company most of those who are posting here are not a real person nor are they anyone we have ever done business with, using these facts you will see that we are not a bad company and we do have a high completion rate.  

You've already made a mistake by waiting, why compound it by 1) buying in a heavily saturated area with 2) a lot of restrictions, 3) with high interest rates (that will impact your cash flow heavily).....?

It applies to just about everything including mortgages.StephanieNot sure why some of you come off as so defensive.

There is the other side to just compounding a good return after good return after good return versus trying to knock it out of the park every time and having one great return followed by a not so great one, followed by a loss...

3. if things get really worse, they play it really nasty and sue me about the mold. how could i defense myself.Answers and experience are highly appreciated.

We are hoarding cash, shifting from offense to defense by pausing evictions and doing zero-increase renewals to save NTVs. 

However, people who made bad note investors don't get bailed out by capital appreciation; their mistakes are compounded by their lack of control over the property, by a court system that assumes the note holder is a bad guy and the borrower a victim; by foreclosure laws requiring a note holder to jump through loops and pay huge legal fees to repossess a property for non payment, by not obtaining title insurance and discovering that their are superior liens on the property, by note sellers who provided incomplete or misleading information, etc.  

In your defense...PPC is expensive, and RVM is cheap.It is easy for me to talk because I get free leads.