data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13237/13237c5b64add91f270805617ff67ab8e577e027" alt=""
21 August 2024 | 2 replies
The answers are invariably yes for new investors, and usually for seasoned investors too—the reason being that you need to know what you are getting into.There is a second equally important reason, though, especially when buying from homeowners or investors: You can usually get a credit or additional work done based on the results of the inspection report.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83e85/83e855032eca44b1476edcdc913b87ee5e26b2e3" alt=""
22 August 2024 | 1 reply
.- lower turnover- easier on the units when they do move- quiet and less disturbance than traditional, younger- for fixed income, consider partnering with the local housing authority for SEct 8 vouchers, then raise rents accordingly - guaranteed money & the Sr. only pays a portion (if they qualify)Traditional renters- Higher turnover- Higher turn costs- More volatile - higher bad debt- More drug related activities- Adding in children that are hard on units- Higher eviction rates and legal costsConsider all angles before making a decision with the changes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73202/732027591f6a8db52391b536068f45e2bcaff20a" alt=""
26 August 2024 | 73 replies
If suspected/in doubt, I would terminate rather than stand the chance of something hitting the fan and having my property labeled a "nuisance property."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24e37/24e37618af786d0481c6f3ce9f786d35c7723670" alt=""
26 August 2024 | 8 replies
I think OKC is more suited to SFH than multifamily as it's a lower density metro area.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91c2c/91c2c0968527070543e2208b5d22ca4ebdfe9d7c" alt=""
26 August 2024 | 10 replies
I'm definitely still in the exploration phase to see if I will end up going this route, but as I've furnished multiple units, I've realized I don't really enjoy that part of the process nor is design a strength of mine, so if I can hire it out to someone who will do a better job than me for a reasonable price, I will.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1ffa/e1ffaf6ffb67e3e7f6ed71abaa85f3a8cbc30b97" alt=""
25 August 2024 | 6 replies
Buying a foreclosure property expect that it is going to need some significant work to get it sellable - so consider it a fix and flip.Not seeing too many short sales today but be patient as they can take a long timeIf you are starting out, it depends on your level of risk as mls I would consider lower risk than foreclosure since you can actually see the property
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8b0a/c8b0aa59da0252d7b186ee9d2e09f282847e67ec" alt=""
19 August 2024 | 3 replies
Hello Everyone,I purchased my NACA home more than 5 years ago, and I obtained a HELOC on my home last year.The financial institution that approved and funded my HELOC was fully aware of the NACA Lien on my home and continued with the process either way.Also, I am not in violation of the occupancy requirements.What would NACA's actions be?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63723/637231d02b2e54c73ddf4976e95f8d3bb15e23c1" alt=""
22 August 2024 | 6 replies
My goal is to leverage 85%, and with an 800 credit score, I'm in a good position.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81883/8188339357d2fe83f504dc2d1606badc5d97a07a" alt=""
21 August 2024 | 4 replies
No deals go perfectly, it's easy to put that responsibility on someone else, but if you do the above, most of your problems will become much smaller.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7e34/e7e34fa7a4c70fb4d56a17ff407d19e3c2516ccf" alt=""
22 August 2024 | 4 replies
Those factors, plus the work needed to underwrite something like that, tend to make them trickier than say, a 90%/100% lender.The second thing is ensuring that the values that they are operating under will work with 100% financing.