
27 January 2011 | 23 replies
How can the government interfere with a private party transaction?

31 January 2011 | 1 reply
I found out today that the governments HASP program is a possible alternative to at least refinancing a property even if you are above the mandated fannie mae 4 property limit.

7 February 2011 | 9 replies
There are ways of doing either or both.When I appraised notes and installment contracts for the government (to assess the note holder eligiblity for benefits and assessing the net worth of the applicants) such appraisals can not be made without collateral inforamtion.

2 February 2011 | 3 replies
Here is an interesting read from the government that just came out from the FCIC.Enjoy:http://c0182732.cdn1.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/fcic_final_report_full.pdf

7 February 2011 | 23 replies
If you spend some time in AZ, you will notice that it is better-governed than both CA and NV.

4 February 2011 | 7 replies
The government is only postponing the inevitable at the expense of the people who are currently paying their financial obligations.I do understand that unemployment is at the highest point ever and people do have health issues but those are not the people who are creating this problem and crashed this market.The people I hear complain the most are the ones that used the 80/20 mortgages, no doc loans with no money down and interest only mortgages.

9 February 2011 | 82 replies
Well I gave it sufficient time for the reply, but took care of that with the quotes.I won't copy all the smart comments made but here you go:GEORGIA TRADE PRACTICE ACT, Chapter 3 Title 8 (adopted 1994) This Act governs those who provide home inspections for a fee and requires that certain aspects of the report are uniformily addressed.

14 February 2011 | 3 replies
Believe it or not, B of A actually took much of the loss on flooded properties arising out of that storm (and indemnified by the government) due to the disaster.

15 February 2012 | 22 replies
Since you don't have a security agreement to govern any foreclosure, you'll likely be ordered to go with a judicial foreclosure and there, you could be slapped with paying your tenant to get them out.Also, the SAFE Act specifically mentions Options and also includes language that leaves any method or scheme that effectively extends financing in a transaction or that attempts to circumvent the intent of the Act.

10 February 2011 | 24 replies
Makes you realize that government has gotten way out of control, and that is a large part of why we are in debt.