Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 14 years ago,

User Stats

1,459
Posts
1,843
Votes
Vikram C.#5 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
1,843
Votes |
1,459
Posts

License to shampoo

Vikram C.#5 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

There was recently a debate on this site about the licensing requirements to take pictures of a house in return for compensation. In that thread, I had a little rant about the creeping role of the licensing into all walks of our economic lives to the detriment of our nation as a whole.

Here's a link to an article in the WSJ on this very subject.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703445904576118030935929752.html

It appears that the proportion of the workforce that is in "licensed" jobs has been steadily going up for several decades. It used to be less than 5% of the workforce half a century back, and has now reached 20% of the workforce. No wonder some people think that one would need a license to tak pics of a house.

Loading replies...