When using the BRRR method how do you avoid putting so much down?

The more problems you solve the larger return you can expect in general, but as an investor who has does large renovations for the past 5 years, I am definitely shifting into more passive deals that may offer lower returns going forward, and I am okay with that at this point. 

If there are multiple listings in that area without permits, then there is a higher likelihood of there being no formal permit process.That is so not a reliable method.

Would I be able buy this property subject-to legally using this method? 

I'm guessing that finding deals is probably a big one in this market, but I'm curious if there is anything else that would make your life significantly easier if it were solved or improved? 

You are selling an idea to the buyer, of selling their property to you.Coming to the most important point – people often sell their problem property or sell it to solve a problem.

Where are you all looking for your deals, and/or what methods are you using to get the deals brought to you?? 

We got a house for $10 dollars, and they can move on with their lives.Because we deal with true motivated sellers (by definition, "motivation" means that is is not necessarily about money) we can easily solve problems for true win win situations.

My question is: Can the sub 2 method still be used when it has gotten that far?

But if you're asking how is the value attributable to any land component of a given property acquisition determined, any reasonable method will suffice (e.g., allocating the land value based upon local property tax valuation ratios might be acceptable).