data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbf8b/cbf8bfc5ca1ffab6f77b0320e325549e0c257040" alt=""
9 February 2017 | 14 replies
The buyers agent that I contacted was really unhelpful when I requested assistance in assessing its ARV.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bf8d/2bf8dc7776bcdccfd067ce645614706f32553edb" alt=""
8 February 2017 | 3 replies
There may be special assessments which change the rate slightly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a601/4a601a115d7b6b2e465b930c23434e35d5b4a9dc" alt=""
9 February 2017 | 1 reply
He owes 167K on the house.Bedrooms: 4 | Bathrooms: 3 | Finished sq ft: 1,764 | Lot size sq ft: 11,775 | Year built: 1952 Tax assessment: $167,100 | Last sold date: 08/22/2007 | Last sold price: $195,000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4db9/d4db976fbf970d4241b961962f38e5004b2c08b2" alt=""
17 February 2017 | 11 replies
We are not confident yet in our assessment of fannie/freddie requirements, so would be looking to an expert, maybe such as yourself?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/173af/173afbe9c5adb830cf67bd66a50984a3e4d2b12d" alt=""
9 February 2017 | 3 replies
Up until that point though, for analysis purposes, I would plan on a re-assessment based on either purchase or appraised value.....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4693e/4693e68f8a775ef651cfd2a0759d2e4ee97fb8fe" alt=""
9 February 2017 | 1 reply
The two of us will need to come up with a way to keep the property and the progress we made from getting vandalized.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f36b4/f36b4db78e18b2a48eeb2b31864acd9a8e7d84c3" alt=""
10 February 2017 | 2 replies
Hey team,I have a question on how to read the data from the assessment website.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43f6f/43f6ff10af3177ce6badb0dac583658787e8317c" alt=""
13 February 2017 | 15 replies
But then, I start thinking; how much progress can I actually make from doing this?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea06d/ea06db3b8916ef06eb13cb820af35f0b8e47fccf" alt=""
13 February 2017 | 4 replies
Common pitfalls are poor underwriting, poor risk assessment, being over zealous, sacrificing prudent lending practice to gain an edge on competitors, no take-out for you loans, lack of available capital, over-promising borrowers and not delivering, improper loan documents or the absence of material docs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73023/730230f4975c7e9d6ad97868cde4ae5fe089117f" alt=""
16 February 2017 | 11 replies
Even 100% financed at 5% you would still be negative $31/month.When assessing a properties potential to cash flow as a minimum it must be positive based on a calculation using 100% financing.