This exemption applies regardless of the total surface area within the residential property that is affected by mold growth.An insurer may not use an underwriting guideline regarding a residential property insurance policy based upon previous mold damage or a prior mold damage claim filed either by the applicant or on the covered property if:It is inspected by an independent mold assessor or adjuster, who is licensed to perform mold assessment who provides to the property owner written certification on a Certificate of Mold Damage Remediation (MDR-1) that based on the mold assessment inspection, the property does not contain evidence of mold damage."

The renting gives you some evidence that you may have purchased the property to hold. 

I've never seriously heard the strategy sold that way.I think it may actually be a disclaimer of interest form or something along those lines... which is more so for title company to ensure that they have evidence the owner has no more financial interest in the property.

Based on what you wrote, I'd agree with you that scenario sounds like the most likely cause, but it also sounds like an opinion which - as you probably know - courts don't consider evidence. 

I have the termite inspection report which says no termite activity but buyers want me to do the termite treatment.From buyers “Wood Destroying Insect ReportDuring the termite inspection it was determined that there is visible evidence of wood destroying insects.

In summary, if there is a slip and fall on ice/snow, and there is a city snow removal and sand ordinance that the landlord cannot prove was met with written evidence, then the landlord may be more exposed to damages.  

I also fire about a client a month when it becomes evident they are not going to close a deal.

It would not need to be certified for income taxes, at least not before its built, rather the Cost Segregation Study would be used to sell the project to lenders and partners as additional evidence of good planning and due diligence.  

I think they did it cause they had suspected him of something much worse, and I believe that other case had DNA evidence. 

., in that case, hit them as hard you can by showing the evidence of their fraud to their commanding officer who will deal with it swiftly.