
9 August 2011 | 10 replies
If the spreads are equal (% wise), I'd take the lower priced property to minimize downside risk if I didn't know what I was doing.

9 August 2011 | 9 replies
You need to ensure that their upcharge is minimal (0-10% depending on what they do).

9 August 2011 | 1 reply
If you want to get cashed out, you'll either have to wait it out OR you can seller finance, then turn around and sell the paper.If you do carry, these types of terms will minimize the discount you'll take when you turn around and sell: 7-12 years with full amortization (no balloons), 6-9% interest, and with a minimum of 20% down (more if they intend to use it as a rental).

2 November 2011 | 3 replies
Could it be argued that giving someone some minimal stake is making them a voting partner/manager and thus the solicitation rules don't apply.

2 December 2008 | 6 replies
I'd be interested in hearing about a lender who will go above 70% LTV with cash out and minimal seasoning, especially based on a new appraisal.

1 January 2009 | 9 replies
All we can do is minimize hazards.

4 October 2010 | 15 replies
Of course, there are desk fees, MLS fees, NAR fees, etc, but they can be pretty minimal as well if you're generating lots of transactions.

19 February 2009 | 75 replies
But I would never write a check for a property that didn’t prove to be profitable with multiple exit strategies available to me, which would minimize risk.Like Richard quoted above: Make a distinction between being interested and being committed.

10 November 2009 | 19 replies
How can I minimize my risk?

24 February 2009 | 14 replies
In my opinion scandals would be minimized if it were not for companies like the company suing me and strong arming me out of helping the public understand exactly what type of business they represent.