More specifically, code section 16-18-070 seems to indicate that it may be possible to get this fee waived if the area meets the goals in the City Space Plan.There are many, many pages of reading material online about the plan, but we are trying to figure out how to tell if the goals for our area are being met.Property is pretty squarely between the actual parks of Wicker Park and Humboldt Park and close to the 606, so this may not be one of the areas of the city requiring additional green space.Basically, if there is a viable way (by meeting current criteria of the City Space Plan) we’d like to not pay the fee if we can supply the correct information.It is very challenging to decipher this and we get one shot at getting the fee waived.If it matters, we are taking an existing 2 flat and turning it into a 3 flat – allowed by area zoning and there are no changes to the footprint of the existing building.We still have more research to do but we couldn’t even find specific information on the progress of the plan’s goals and what areas meet the Open Space Requirements now.16-18-070 Individualized Assessment Of Impact.

I've been listening to podcasts and reading material here for years, but just recently became more active in the forums.  

You would need to establish that the seller either intentionally, or negligently failed to disclose a "material" fact.

.😊  I calmed down and re read the contract again trying to figure out what  to screen grab for you and found that the home inspection clause box IS checked- which discusses inspection for material defects.  

My mortgage broker also told me taking out this rehab loan is also going to raise my interest rate around 0.25%.What I am trying to do is cover the parts of the rehab that don't take so much labor, and purchase the materials and DIY for the other parts that are more labor intensive.

Should labor be evaluated based on material costs? 

Some get part of the sponsors promote.  

It have the same format as Avon, Monat etc. where the owner is selling and promoting goods to mostly their friends and social media followers.

They are copyrighted materials.

My background is in internet marketing and I have been promoting products and ideas since 2002.