Landlords forget that their business involves actual human beings sometimes.Would you be willing to rent a place that required 4 times the income? 

So will use the 'no smaller than the largest television in the household' prescription to point out that the larger, the heavier too, and the wording does not specify a maximum weight for safety yet commonsense dictates their ought to be one.Anything over a couple hundred pounds (around the weight of a large human being and/or pieces of furniture typically found residentially), would pose a significant structural risk thus we will limit capacity to like u say 20 gallons max due to structural weight constraints.

Investors place themselves in a position of influencing and controlling basic aspects of human needs in society, the need for shelter.

For all dwelling units intended for human occupancy for which a building permit is issued on or after January 1, 2014, for alterations, repairs, or additions exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), the permit issuer shall not sign off on the completion of work until the permittee demonstrates that all smoke alarms required for the dwelling unit are devices approved and listed by OSFM. 3.

tenant A loves dogs but the building policy prohibits pets. one day, tenant A notices thru the front window that tenant B moved in with 2 dogs (a pit bull mix and a german sheperd mix) with the PM present and no issue was apparently raised; landlord even pet and played with the dogs. tenant A feels betrayed and goes out and buys a yorkie. landlord finds out and issues notice of breach of contract and to vacate or restore the apt to its pet-free requirements.tenant A contronts landlord and demands explanation as to why tenant B has 2 big dogs but tenant A cant have 1 tiny one. landlord discloses tenant B provided proof that each of the 2 dogs are emotional support animals.tenant A asks tenant B why does she have 2 emotional support animals, and for a referral to a professional that could also recommend 2 or 3 dogs so he can keep his yorkie and get a playmate for his and maybe even the yorkie's 'emotional support' each.tenant B is insulted and files a HUD complaint that landlord shared that she needs emotional support (per Fair Housing Act, landlords may not divulge that a tenant has any disability to any third party).meanwhile, tenant C whose toddler was soon after mauled to death by tenant B's sheperd mix, has just won a case in California Supreme Court finding the landlord to be a statutory owner of the dog since it was accepted onto the premises simply based on a letter written by a 'pet therapist' without regard - and consequentially, with negligence - to the other tenants' safety and thus responsible for $2,000,000 in compensation to tenant C for the loss of precious human life, regardless of whether landlord was negligent or not, and regardless of whether animal was a service/support animal or pet.landlord, having lost his countersuit against tenant B for vicious 'support' animal's lethal actions, files claim for his homeowner's insurance to cover the $250 million he owes tenant C but claim is denied altogether on basis that building had a no pet policy and dogs were not declared and the pit bull mix, though recommended, was never even licensed.last but not least, landlord receives summons, subpoenas, etc from HUD and appears for trial in Federal Civil Court. judge finds landlord guilty of divulging that tenant has a disability and orders landlord to pay the statutory $16,000 for one county of housing discrimination,  plus 300,000 in actual damages for the complainant (and of course, her attorneys fees) for she is emotionally scarred for life!

I pulled her file and discovered that the form I require for dogs in my properties had not been completed by a Vet and did not state that the dog was not aggressive toward humans. 

Therefore, an examination would be fruitless.No - See first two questions.Bear in mind that rabies in humans is rare and most bats don't carry the disease.

and the Humane Society got a nice donation...then 20k down on a cute coastal home that cash flows over $600 a month net!!!   

The human makes a bigger difference than whether they have a dog or cat or what breed their dog is, etc. 

By this point the automated system (The Work Number and whatever the company uses internally) has already failed, so I require them to give me a specific name/phone/email of an actual human person that can confirm their employment and look up their last 2 years as well as YTD compensation and complete the relevant Fannie Mae written verification of employment form.