If there were issues arising from excessive damages, such as a borrower rehabbing and destroying the collateral, that is another matter for civil courts to assess consequential damages.That leaves seller financed transactions to be assessed, to the financial side.Dodd-Frank, the SAFE Act and all other underwriting guidelines fail to address the ownership of the note as an asset, much has to do with servicing and reporting requirements, but aspects of asset valuation are totally ignored.

Mostly things that would go to court, lawsuits and probate.

I'd like to see actual documents and court records.

If there is a few bad eggs you lie their way to an investment that they were not suppose to be a part of, I would imagine that due diligence on the funding portals would come up in court as a responsibility along with the individual's fraudulent representations.

If there is a court case and a seller went through a RMLO, there is no possible ATR case against the seller, IMHO.

I'm curious - when you've gone to court against tenants (assuming you have) - has that clause held up?

Unless you plan to have clauses that say the signor agrees that Wyoming, County of Laramie for all legal disputes and they consent to litigate all matters in that court, it is not as much help as most people think.

____________________________________________________________Hey Angel, I've heard that in the UK, if You trespass so many times without challenge that You can eventually end up in court claiming ownership of that land.However, We all know that You cant own any land, only the right to "lay waste upon" the land.Besides confrontation, what's Your angle here?

Typically it's posted at the courthouse or on a court website.

Look to court records in related RE suits, foreclosures, liability/landlords, see who represents developers and builders.