All those companies have the same model.  ..and they use the same speakers / salespeople..  

I already assume $50-100 worth of prep costs in between tenants so turnover is already part of my business model.

Add to that a basically exploitative model based on stealing equity from uneducated or elderly sellers I would argue this whole business model needs to made illegal with no ambiguity.

Maybe a couple hours away or more but there is not a the marketing machine to expose these as much as the OOS flavor gets. 

Essentially it breaks down as 3 partners, one provides sweat equity through property acquisition to placing property management, one does financial modeling and analysis, and the third provides capital.

I've been tempted to invest there many times but it just does not fit our model as there's no appreciation.One of my reia groups had several people go to buffalo, buy up all the tax lien properties at huge discounts, rehab, and try to resell.

Much of the "growth" reported by retailers has resulted from poaching existing store sales: The American Model of "Growth": Overbuilding and Poaching (November 19, 2013).Once the wheels fall off this model of "growth," chains will enter a cycle of closing marginal stores to boost profits.

Depends on your business model, but the comments above are on point.

The thought of always outsourcing the debt to my tenants is possible but potentially, has no end in sight if I keep following the finance/buy model.

If you plan to do any kind of marketing for this property, you'll find that you get sellers of all flavors, and the solution or exit strategy can be just as varied.Not too long about, we had six seller appointments in one day.