In all social media, your strategy and goals are what are most important.If you had 300 Twitter followers who were local investors in your market, and who you regularly did business with, I'd say you were in a MUCH better position than someone with 25,000 followers that were just random folks.Social media isn't about the number of people you're connected to, but the quality of relationship you forge with those people.That's why the top posters on BP are typically finding the most success from our site -- they are forging the strongest relationships.I really believe that you must have a strategy on Twitter or any other social platform or you're just spinning your wheels.

In this day and age, it is tough to hide with all of the social media.

Do you ask for additional bank statements, tax returns to see if the person has enough savings to supplement their Social Security benefits and qualify for 3X gross income?

If he is denied social security disability, there's a reason.

Within a couple days, my property became the block hang out, we had huge social groups, bbq's, etc. outside of the home because everyone was getting together for some real positive change.

Not sure of the implication of that on the property2) There were a lot of vagrants at the corners of the street.

I also have a number of LLC owned properties that I want to keep for a long time.I'm thinking it would be much easier just keeping it all in the LLC, but I want to understand tax implications as I am thinking this needs to be an arms-length transaction.1.

Wife's social security # came up as "invalid" on two different search sites and the guy seems to have a huge list of unexplained past addresses and p.o. boxes...I think I'll be moving on to find some different renters.

What it sounds like from the local "in the know" CPA is that the following "related party transaction" should occur as follows:1 Agent and 501(C)(3) enter agreement dictating that a specific amount of money will be donated by agent from "qualified transactions".2) RE agent generates a commission from the sale of a "qualified transaction".3) Agent donates predetermined amount of money to 501(C)(3).4) 501(C)(3) realizes this income as non-UBI, agent expenses the amount paid, so there is no negative tax implication for either party.Does this sound plausible and accurate?

Not realizing the implications of having to get permits/inspections for the smallest things in a high end condo complex.