So you know my bias, I am a Realtor in Las Vegas and my practice is almost exclusively remote investors (other states or countries) so I obviously see no problem with remote investing provided you trust the team.If financial independence is your goal then I recommend that you vet every property by the following criteria:• Sustained profitability - With real estate your minimum horizon is at least 7 to 10 years so a buying based only on the current market situation is likely to leave you in a very bad situation in a few years.• Located in an area likely to appreciate over time.• Landlord friendly laws and taxes.Combined, these three requirements are not easy to fulfill.

McClatchey is selling a nationwide program then he probably knows that seller financing in any greater volume then the states exclusion numbers requires licensing or a RMLO at the least to do your paper work then the qualified mort rules etc.. so Its not much fun anymore in my mind like it used to be or you need to pick the under regulated states.I also am not one to espouse that one can get rich quickly in RE with no money or means.

In my mind these two statements are mutually exclusive.

Land court has exclusive jurisdiction regarding real estate title.

Well the $400 Aug payment was all we got until they moved out Oct 1 and we just got it leased for Dec 1 after I insisted on putting an ad online because the newspaper and sign in front was not working.  

Account Closed We, at Two Bridges Asset Management LLC, are also located in Brooklyn, but we invest exclusively in the Southeast.  

I use this strategy almost exclusively.

This is not exactly brokering because the list is being sold, just like a newspaper is sold to a tenant prospect with a list of the newspaper's published rental ads.Brokering occurs when a fee is collected (only) for matching up the tenant with the landlord.

I don't think school and investing have to be mutually exclusive, it is not an either/or.

Texas also has a charging order as the exclusive remedy against a members interest and expressly limits piercing of the veil to much more restricted circumstances (actual fraud is the big one that allows piercing).