I've just recently come to the conclusion that my time is more valuable than the price I have been subcontracting it out for the last 20 years.

Got it, I was coming to the same conclusion but was not sure, because I figured anything that was good flip has to be good BRRRR. 

They just base their conclusions on what they hear or see on late night TV.

So then we need to dive into various regression analyses in order to arrive at a conclusion about the expected rent for the area. 

Let them draw the conclusion that the front yard isn't safe.

Or, perhaps it's because attorneys like to drag things out because they stop getting paid when the case comes to conclusion...Good luck

You should get at least a few opinions about neighborhoods before coming to your own conclusions, Cincinnati can be tricky because a lot of neighborhoods turn quickly between bad and good.Hope to meet you soon!

As I am typing this I am drawing my own conclusion...

The courts would likely arrive at the same conclusions described in 1 – 4, above.

In the commercial mortgage space we have found that NPN investments can be divided between(1) purchasing NPNs in which we’ve had no or minimal contact with the borrower, and(2) purchasing NPNs in which we’ve worked out details of a restructuring with the borrower prior to purchasing the noteAlthough the following is in no way a scientific, statistically verifiable conclusion, here is what we’ve concluded through empirical evidence1 - purchase discounts from UPB do not differ either way2 - having borrower agreement before note purchase results in much greater chance of creating a reperforming note3 - having borrower agreement before note purchase results in much less chance of having to foreclose4 - having borrower agreement before note purchase results in borrower seeing us as an ally not as an enemyAside from 1 above, the results are exactly what you’d expect.