I doubt the city will just close it for you based on your word/belief that the tank was never removed and you have no interest in removing it now.In my opinion, it would be very unlikely that the permit was pulled, the tank was dug up and removed, and then contamination was found and subsequently hidden... if an oil tank company actually pulled a permit for removal they are probably scrupulous to know that they wouldn't be able to get away with that.

They immediatly started sliding on my floors and crashing into the walls.

We have an NFA letter as well as the paperwork for the well tests that were completed subsequent to that and we still did a tank sweep.

Billing the tenant based on his usage: in here, everything is under the owner name, and the owner emails a broken down utility copy from the electricity/gas companies to each tenant, and presents how much their meter displays and subsequently how much they own. 

The previous 3-Day Pay or Quit notice you served won't suffice because that was only for the past due rent, which was subsequently paid. 

Make sure the attorney can both drive the eviction and the subsequent collections process post eviction.I hope this helps.

You can't convert the nature of these expenses.As far as whether or not this is normal behavior for the IRS to now audit subsequent years, the answer is Yes. 

That rule is intended for subsequent upgrades after the asset is placed into service.

. $300 for the first year and $150 in subsequent years in fees is still better in most cases than paying taxes.

Did you put the current and subsequent months rents on the form or just the month that you filed?