This means you are doing it strictly for the cash flow.If it were me, I would go the ADU route, Rents could be comparable to the condo without the HOA dues (yes higher Cap-Ex but those are long term expenses), and with everything on one property, things are just easier to manage (one mortgage, one property tax bill, one insurance, etc.). 

His ex wife (also on the show) introduced him, and then inexplicably told that they had lost all their money trying to fix and flip when the economy went bad, that they filed bankruptcy, that her husband went into a state of depression and refused to look for a job or even leave the house for three months, that she contacted an old “mentor” of his in Las Vegas, that she got him to go with her to Vegas, and that this mentor had set up the program, marketing etc that he was about to pitch.

Again, PT is the one that voluntarily mentioned that he/she is getting the divorce and he/she also stated that he/she is the co-signer on the soon to be ex wifes/husbands mortgage (which has shown on prospective tenants credit report) but the soon to be ex is the one that currently  pays the mortgage AND WILL CONTINUE TO PAY MORTGAGE.

They will allow someone to rent a property with more bedrooms than what's on their voucher, but not less as long as the rent amount meets their requirements (ex/ a 2BR voucher can rent a 3BR, but not a 1BR). 

The RIA just wrote it a day ago.https://seracapital.com/721-ex...Lan, the answer is clear.

Welcome to the Forum from an ex-Californian!

<< EX: Eric >> This week I closed on 2 homes.

@Daniel Ben-Hur - It really is going to depend on whether you have cash reserves for vacancy, repairs and cap ex. 

(Ex: did you hire a property manager?

My rules of thumb for op ex ratio:New product 40%1990 2000 product 45%1960 1970 1980 product 50%+