These line items are meant to be reserves you stash away for a rainy day, so there's no harm in over-estimating them. 

It could be worth it if you find a big enough non-disclosure but it seems unlikely (but no harm checking).  

However, you can only harm the bull if it is a danger to yourself or others, not property.

@Linda Chanthakhinh No harm in sending a contract to the seller to see if it gets a response. 

There’s likely going to be an EPIDEMIC harm to remodelers handling harmful materials, such as cutting hardibacker etc without protection.

Your responses containing remarks such as “increasing liability insurance” or “doing more harm than good” are just petty.

Thankfully no Individuals or cabins were harmed but a few fences were destroyed.

So, while there may be a delayed payment, we believe the vast majority will pay because they know even a late payment will harm their credit for years.

Can’t let the hype be this big, there’s too many other things that will harm people if we focus on one problem.

My suggestion -- not my reasoned legal advice, merely a suggestion -- is that landlords should not make motions based on 'economic harm' unless they are prepared to back up, in detail, the nature and extent of both the harm and the urgency.