
29 October 2010 | 3 replies
I'm not one to shy away from danger (I broke my ankle pretty bad this past Fourth of July on a rock climbing trip), but I have still told my employer "no" when it comes to something stupid dangerous (no, I'm not climbing to the top of a 40ft ladder with only one leg on the ground, and I don't care if you're holding it.)My main gripe however, as you mentioned, was the reaction to automatically regulate or restrict any activity that may, in some possible way, harm someone.

1 January 2011 | 3 replies
I keep hearing from different investors and gurus to stay away from such deals due to the fact that these houses come with strict deed restrictions which make them a lot harder to wholesale.Does anybody have a different opinion about this.?

22 September 2020 | 23 replies
I'm sure they view this as consistent with their mission of fostering home ownership.There is also a standard deed restriction with fannie indicating you can't resell for more than 20% above what you paid for 90 days.

23 December 2012 | 18 replies
if you are licensed, then there may be restrictions...i'm not licensed however, so im' free to offer finder's fee to tenant's, friends, colleagues, etc.

6 January 2010 | 24 replies
:lol: The only thing that kept me interested in Palmdale was the chance for seasons and less restrictive zoning.

17 August 2009 | 6 replies
My only concern is that this person will move her boyfriend in, then her mother, and niece, etc.Question: legally (in WA state) how many people can I restrict to living in a 1 bedroom?

28 August 2009 | 17 replies
Some listed it as a crime prior to 1900, but imposed no penalty.Attempted suicide was considered a crime by some states, but as of 1963, it was still on the books in only 6 states.

16 November 2010 | 85 replies
HI Scott, I did put in a request for them to remove the deed restriction.

8 September 2009 | 5 replies
The park can not prevent anyone from purchasing the home, but might be able to restrict who occupies it.