Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago,

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,192
Votes
J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,192
Votes |
17,995
Posts

Right to Die

J Scott
Pro Member
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorPosted

Thought this was an interesting article:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/08/14/australia.right.to.die/index.html

I know that most people here believe that the government should have absolutely no control over people's end-of-life decisions (including me!), so I'm curious if you think that the government should have the right to tell someone that they can't commit suicide?

Obviously, that's not what happened in this case, but just the fact that the government had to be consulted brings up some interesting questions...

Btw, my take is that I completely agree with everyone who says the government shouldn't have any say in end-of-life care, and therefore it bothers me that this guy even needed the government's approval (or that the hospital needed the government's approval) before he was granted the right to no longer nourish himself.

Loading replies...