They hire or get "Barney Fife" type volunteers to cruse the neighborhood looking for violations of the covenants and restrictions.

This is an off topic section, so your political views are ok here, but may be restricted to the middle east because of remaining on topic of the original post.To that extent I can not understand your statement that Perhaps im a bit shallow or near sighted, but that directly does not affect American people, other than the husbands, brothers, wives lost for such a cause. because there were an awful lot of american people lost in the world trade center when it collapsed.

I just don't appreciate preaching, imposing your believes on others, or hypocrisy.

This guy owed the law firm 3k (not much) and they did not read over any of the restrictive paper work I made this scum bag I was buying the house sign.

I take that back - I did hear about this today - the gist of it is"Expand the current First-Time Homebuyer Tax Credit incentive from the lesser of 10 percent of the purchase price of the home or $8,000 to a higher limit of either 10 percent or $15,000 for all homebuyers, remove the income restrictions and include all primary residence purchases for one full year"More info can be found here...http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124460195604101021.htmlI heard in addition to the group pushing this that a member of congress has been found to sponsor a bill.

:cool: A view at the numbers…Democrat Health “Reform†By the NumbersJuly 20, 2009—UPDATEDHere is a compiled a list of important numbers relevant to the House Democrats’ 1,018-page “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act:â€114 million—Number of individuals who could lose their current coverage under the bill, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group4.7 million—Number of jobs that could be lost as a result of taxes on businesses that cannot afford to provide health insurance coverage, according to a model developed by Council of Economic Advisors Chair Christina Romer$818 billion—Total new taxes on individuals who cannot afford health coverage, and employers who cannot afford to provide coverage that meet federal bureaucrats’ standards$1.28 trillion—New federal spending in the next ten years, according to a Congressional Budget Office score of selected elements of the bill.6%—Percentage of all that new spending occurring in the bill’s first three years—representing a debt and tax “time bomb†in the program’s later years that will explode for future generations$88,200—Definition of “low-income†family of four for purposes of health insurance subsidies33—Entitlement programs the bill creates, expands, or extends—an increase from an earlier draft53—Additional offices, bureaus, commissions, programs, and bureaucracies the bill creates over and above the entitlement expansions—also an increase from the discussion draft1,683—Uses of the word “shall,†representing new duties for bureaucrats and mandates on individuals, businesses, and States—and an increase of 306 mandates from the discussion draft$10 billion—Minimum loss sustained by taxpayers every year due to Medicare fraud; the government-run health plan does not reform the ineffective anti-fraud statutes and procedures that have kept Medicare on the Government Accountability Office’s list of high-risk programs for two decadesZero—Prohibitions on government programs like Medicare and Medicaid from using cost-effectiveness research to impose delays to or denials for access to life-saving treatments2017—Year Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted—a date unchanged by the bill, which re-directs savings from Medicare to fund new entitlements for younger Americans$2,500—Promised savings for each American family from health reform, according to then-Senator Obama’s campaign pledge—savings which the Congressional Budget Office has confirmed will not materialize, as the bill will not slow the growth of health care costs

Usually they have to get on the agenda--if they can find out when and how to do that, then they are generally restricted to possibly 2-3 minutes to say what they have to say.

The bank will likely have restrictions on how big of a second you can provide.

Dwight,Even if you are a dealer to real estate, there is no law that prohibits or restricts your ability to do business.

I received a letter acknowledging my full application was received and in the reply it is stated that due to the LACK of FEDERAL FUNDING they may have to temporarily stop enrollments.I do not want the feds running Healthcare they need to make medicaid and Schipps all private industry run with Federal oversight and strick regulations.Cap insurance profit, Cap or restrict Tort lawsuits, Fine individuals who opt out of coverage, and then see where we are at in a few years, but if they cannot fund a program restricted to children, when it is costing them only 1/3 of the program , that is not a freebie..