Usually, they would be motivated by the ability to receive ongoing payments without the headaches of property ownership.

Not sure if they are in your numbers already but the 1960 property will likely require more ongoing maintenance and repairs than the other, so with only the information provided, I'd lean toward Property 2.Beyond what you wrote, I'd compare the communities.  

Otherwise this seems like it will just be an ongoing debate with a tenant who seems unreasonable. 

I ran the numbers using the bigger pockets wholesaling calculator.

Then there'll be ongoing training.As far as brokers taking you on, if you don't plan on making them much money and they're as responsible as you are for your bad acts as a broker - Why would he take you on?

I ran my numbers and the ARV is $129K had my agent run them and she came up with the same thing.

Now I understand the reason PM side for tenants, they are their ongoing clients, not the owners!

You’ll be able to use pricing as an ongoing level -- if you get filled up too quickly, you can increase pricing.

I ran all the numbers through the BP calculator multiple times and the numbers make sense.

In my mind you have the person who is in the business and has on going projects.