![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/383944/small_1621448132-avatar-jackt7.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
25 January 2016 | 20 replies
The city data provided in your document isn't something I fully understand and wanted to ask how to interpret it.
4 February 2016 | 7 replies
A realtor is not supposed to solicit business from someone who has an agent, or do anything that could potentially be interpreted as doing so.If you do want the opinion of a local agent, and you do not want them to list the property, I would suggest paying them a consulting free perhaps.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/461942/small_1621477716-avatar-brianl51.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
1 February 2016 | 6 replies
Many people mis-interpret this.
3 February 2016 | 15 replies
What a judge would deem as excessive is open to an interpretation.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/463971/small_1621477800-avatar-achrafe.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
6 February 2016 | 7 replies
And to address your question of buying the LLC versus buying the property itself...My interpretation is that if you buy the company which owns the building instead of the building itself, there is no sale of the building for which the county to base any revaluation upon.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/88038/small_1621416436-avatar-rishelgroup.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 February 2016 | 6 replies
Clearly, this was done intentionally to differentiate the FinCEN requirements from those other statutes, so that FinCEN’s interpretation is not based on the interpretation of those statutes.13 Moreover, FinCEN has taken the position that the registration and training requirements under the SAFE Act are not sufficient to address all of the concerns and accomplish all of the goals related to AML and SAR programs.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/71233/small_1621414492-avatar-jthomasmartin1.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
19 November 2017 | 176 replies
Also, remind me about the rent chart, I'll share with you my interpretation on it.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/292220/small_1621442124-avatar-ryanr8.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
18 April 2016 | 179 replies
I interpret this to mean that you're definitely not buying it at the bottom.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/436720/small_1621476574-avatar-jamesm135.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
4 February 2016 | 3 replies
Maybe it is confusing and the end of you residency can be interpreted as when you first lived there.
![](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/329060/small_1696640371-avatar-lindsayn.jpg?twic=v1/output=image&v=2)
7 February 2016 | 15 replies
You need to take a hard line and strict interpretation of the lease, and here is the reason:If the demand(s) they make is(are) not written in the lease and you comply with them, they become part of the lease, anyway!