Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago,

User Stats

74
Posts
11
Votes
James Maher
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Campobello, SC
11
Votes |
74
Posts

Is this right?

James Maher
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Campobello, SC
Posted
I'm reading a book and the author mentions the primary residence capital gains exclusion. Either it is worded weird or he is just flat out wrong. The book states that you can live in a house for 2 years and rent it for 3 years and then sell it as long as it is sold within the 5 year mark from when you first lived in it as your primary. Is this just an odd wording or what? The sentence makes it sound like if you lived in a property for 10 years and rented it out for 3 that you would pay capital gains upon the sale.

Loading replies...