The underwhelming results of the overarching HAMP program. As

I would also advocate getting bids.Kevins suggestion of seeking independent advice is a good one, even for lower amounts as premiums can be paid for a long time.I'll still can't get to that site, so if anyone wants to put up the basis of the program as to how or why a policy could or should be used to promote RE would be a good thing...

I also have a PM for some of my properties and they have been using a self-showing service: they get the tenants application and DL, prescreen them a bit over the phone then program a digital lock box (Sentrilock) for a one-time showing.

Here's the catch with those programs:1) Getting in the program as a 0 exp in GUC is impossible2) Even when partnering with a builder, that builder will only get credit for the builds he's done for himself. 

I liked the basics of the program as well and felt learning the process would be advantageous.

In this case, the insurance fund has been argued to be underfunded in the past, so reducing the premiums charged was the exact opposite thing a prudent person would do it they hope for long-term viability of the program. A

And yes, rentals/ holding IS a slow wealth build program, as opposed to what?

Found a house that was within reasonable driving distance to campus and then reached out to other people who were in the same program as me until it was filled up.

Maybe he can start a "clunker house" program. A

With all this chatter-it could give the program a big boost if we could hear about it right from the horses mouth without trying to sell us something in the process.