Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Foreclosures
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago,

User Stats

194
Posts
31
Votes
Tim Silvers
  • Las Vegas, NV
31
Votes |
194
Posts

HAFA, REALTOR ETHICS, & THE FUTURE OF SHORT SALE FLIPPING

Tim Silvers
  • Las Vegas, NV
Posted

Does anyone have a clear picture how the HAFA 90-day hold will affect those of us doing double closings and using transactional funding?
http://realestateresult.com/short-sale-rules-will-impact-buyers-starting-april-2010/

And here's yet another anti-flip piece I came across:
http://www.realtor.org/rmolaw_and_ethics/articles/2010/1004_law_shortsalesethics

"4. Selling to a flipper. Unless the investor in a flip is prepared to add substantial value by fixing up a property, don’t participate in a flip. Short sale flips benefit only the investor, who’s clipping off money that could go to an already bleeding lender."
This is just plain anti-trust and totally biased, as my answer lies in the fine print at the bottom of the article; it is no wonder, having been written by an anti-investor, pro-lender. Just plain wrong.

Like we don't already face enough obstacles!




Loading replies...