data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcc4a/bcc4a5f7adc4dc971943871061578b6046df4881" alt=""
1 May 2016 | 14 replies
TONS of quality and easy to interpret info there!!!!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/489e8/489e8882af409cf395a38322167dfceff3fca206" alt=""
16 March 2017 | 9 replies
I just never been through the process and wondering who have to see if my interpretation is correct.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d030/5d03068989fb6f84e5265a0742cc286cbcae9661" alt=""
26 October 2019 | 9 replies
The tenants indicate that because the pets are certified companion/service animals I cannot collect extra rent or additional deposit and my interpretation of the law seems to agree with this view.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/809c5/809c5bc6032986864b9971cfd75f84edc1d9a6b9" alt=""
27 September 2015 | 6 replies
I've read interpretation bulletins from the CRA, where they are taking an increasingly dour view on the practice and have deemed the practice as an instalment sale in some situations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6d10/d6d10acf3956ab6244e9eef35ef3d49bb21d6a12" alt=""
26 September 2015 | 1 reply
The definition of all those terms are obvious, but if you're trying to back into a pro forma you're looking at or create your own how do all those elements work together?For example, if there is a 75% chance of renewa...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f06c/5f06cbaea65b36085d6845e5af92c0f42fcfec1b" alt=""
1 October 2015 | 20 replies
They each interpreted that differently based on their personality (and political stance it seems), but if I had to guess at the end of the day, they both get in their car, drive home and don't think much more about it.Having said that, I would guess doing something to make their jobs more complicated may not be the best approach.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dbdb/8dbdb70f9eb5901cba27a901493138d57312cae0" alt=""
12 November 2018 | 13 replies
This case is concerned with equipment leases, personal property not real property under Uniform Lawhttp://www.irs.gov/irb/2014-8_IRB/ar04.html Covers partnership liability with respect to disguised sales, you can also see the interpretation and reasoning as applicable to any buyer/entity. http://www.ccim.com/cire-magazine/articles/lease-o...Brian, IMO, 1 & 2 above are not applicable, this is a Master Lease of an apartment complex, there is no fair market rent that a Realtor (generally) can identify, there is no "market". #3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ad3c/9ad3cae1b95bec5b2a8013e5adbfe9fba97e8571" alt=""
13 November 2015 | 32 replies
@Matthew Kreitzer Logan A.My understanding is that in the area of taxation, CPAs are allowed to interpret federal, state, and local tax laws for clients, as long as the legal principles being interpreted do not extend beyond tax law and it will not be considered UPL.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d628/8d628db357331470d76150f5c605e09732947d19" alt=""
13 October 2015 | 2 replies
Please don't interpret this as the offers will be ridiculous in nature.2 - Will they make offers before I inspect the property?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcc4b/fcc4b09c6cf63831dc55ee1e4337ff1ac102c7f4" alt=""
14 October 2015 | 14 replies
Investors here like to argue from a micro interpretation of hey, I leased the place, nothing wrong with that.