(he thought he sold too soon and he should have held onto the property and therefore deserved the equity increase.)

They like many realize most need their hand held etc.

Similar green energy investments could be considered if you can make the numbers work (credits on some types of low income housing can be north of 50%).Depending on how long these properties have been held, they could consider implementing cost segregation studies via a change in accounting method to accelerate some depreciation.The operating proceeds could be re-deployed into new properties where cost segregation is an option to accelerate depreciation to offset proceeds.If the properties are low basis and we are not maximizing the 199A deduction, maybe considering an S-Corp structure for management to be able to participate in retirement plans and also generate wages to use as a 199A base. 

I was made aware this weekend by one of the investors on our Facebook group that Marco Santarelli on June 18th, 2024, held a "web seminar" again soliciting investors.

Seller could be awarded legal fees for the lis pendens portion of the case, which you could be held responsible for.

I have a house in TX that I own subject to. I'm looking at possibly re-selling it. Are there any restrictions on re-selling it also as a subject to to a new purchaser? 

If you have not performed rehab, you typically will need to have held the property for 6 months before borrowing based on the appraised value - otherwise, in those first 6 months you will be limited to 80% of your purchase price. 

You shouldn't have to be held to a 1.25 ratio to get 7-8% rates. 

Hi MikeAre your properties held in your personal name of an LLC? 

My realtor said that initially he thought the ARV for my building would only increase by about $60K but that if I held over the long term eventually I would get the value.