If you're solely focused on extracting the maximum value from the property, you might end up working against yourself.

I just recently moved back home to NJ for work and decided to move back in with my parents (not fun but ironically closer to where my job got transferred rather than getting a place) so I am saving a ton more money that will hopefully enable me to make my first deal this year.

If I had not extracted value I would be rolling in cash flow. 

I negotiated the initial deal, brought it to a Bigger Pockets investor and then once we closed on it, I did all the project management and coordinated with the contractors as much as possible enabling partner to travel and be as remotely as needed.

I negotiated the initial deal, brought it to a Bigger Pockets investor and then once we closed on it, I did all the project management and coordinated with the contractors as much as possible enabling partner to travel and be as remotely as needed.

Here are some considerations for both options:Investing Out of State:Affordability: Certain out-of-state cities may have more reasonably priced real estate, enabling you to get into the real estate market sooner.Cash Flow: Compared to pricey locations like San Diego, turnkey houses in other cities may offer higher cash flow.Diversification: You may diversify your real estate portfolio by investing in several markets.House Hacking in San Diego:Local Knowledge: Having knowledge of your local market might be beneficial.

If hiring a property manager frees up your time and enables you to concentrate on activities that generate revenue, it can be worth it.For your next house hack, think about working as a group.

I think I explore equity extraction to have some liquid ready to go.

These type of people always have a story about the job they're about to get, tax refund coming soon, inheritance, etc. and when you drill down you find out they lack basic things (ID) that would enable them to follow through on their plans.

These rules, which include a requirement that sellers set aside a portion of the purchase price for buyer-agent commissions, prohibitions on modifying the commission, and permission to filter listings by commission, all enable NAR, its co-defendants, and its members to maintain buyer-agent commissions at supra-competitive levels unrelated to brokers’ experience or the services provided, steer home buyers away from lower commission homes, and drive out discounters—among other harms."