Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Real Estate Agent
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 10 months ago, 02/28/2024

User Stats

117
Posts
96
Votes
Joseph Coleman
Agent
Pro Member
  • Denver, CO
96
Votes |
117
Posts

Is The National Association of Realtors (NAR) A Cartel?

Joseph Coleman
Agent
Pro Member
  • Denver, CO
Posted

Hi Everyone! I was reading through the Class Action Complaint put forth by Judge Andrea Wood recently and wanted to get some opinions on,

1. Is it true that the NAR is effectively operating as a cartel?

2. How do you think this legal process will conclude?

3. Would prohibiting price fixing by the NAR be a good thing or a bad thing for buyers and the real estate industry as a whole?

Background:
In the Class Action Complaint (linked below) the Judge accused the NAR of fixing prices and states,

"For decades, home buyers across America have been unwittingly paying too much for, and receiving too little from, services offered to them by real estate agent members of NAR.Despite agent representations (which NAR permits and encourages) that such services do not cost home buyers anything, home buyers in fact pay a hefty cost for these services—namely, supracompetitive commissions at levels fixed by the Defendants, which in turn lead to higher home prices paid by buyers...

as part of their membership, brokers must also agree to follow NAR’s rules, practices, and guidelines. These rules, which include a requirement that sellers set aside a portion of the purchase price for buyer-agent commissions, prohibitions on modifying the commission, and permission to filter listings by commission, all enable NAR, its co-defendants, and its members to maintain buyer-agent commissions at supra-competitive levels unrelated to brokers’ experience or the services provided, steer home buyers away from lower commission homes, and drive out discounters—among other harms."

The way that this reads, it sounds like the NAR is essentially being accused of operating as a cartel. If this is true, it makes one wonder why an anti-trust lawsuit has not come up before. 

https://webassets.inman.com/wp...

Loading replies...