Thanks for sharing @Steve Gerten...just the beginning of disruptive technology to hit the industry.

What people forget is that tenants don't get any benefit from the disruption of selling a property.

So if the tenant is responsible they call a few days before move in there is no disruption in service and no need for adults.

It also allows tenants to "weed themselves out" without having the expense and disruption of eviction.  

@Helen Zhang interesting stuff...we just made it through the initial regulation round here in Columbus...not too bad of an outcome, but this is just the sign of the times with this disruptive technology...

Nothing disrupts a nap schedule like banks and qualifying for loans.Hard money is pretty expensive with strict payback deadlines so be careful. 

It seems there have been a few properties that have rented to disruptive tenants, prompting the actions of the commissioners.

If so, instead of signing the current cash for keys agreement should I reduce the amount of the agreement to still expedite the move out prior to the 30 day requirement (to ensure house is empty by closing) with the thought the tenant would still agree to an amended agreement opposed to being evicted for disrupting my transaction that cost me a significant margin of sales profit?

If so, instead of signing the current cash for keys agreement should I reduce the amount of the agreement to still expedite the move out prior to the 30 day requirement (to ensure house is empty by closing) with the thought the tenant would still agree to an amended agreement opposed to being evicted for disrupting my transaction that cost me a significant margin of sales profit?

I can see how the disruption of a process could actually slow it down.