Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

33
Posts
35
Votes
Edward Brewington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Torrance, CA
35
Votes |
33
Posts

Charge $99 for service fee for doing nothing!

Edward Brewington
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Torrance, CA
Posted

I recently had my rental property thoroughly remodeled w/ my property management in charge.They took a month to get a tenant. When they got a new tenant he reported the heater did not work. He had no hot water. The property management sent out company to fix the boiler because the tenant said it did not work. It was simply a  pilot light out and simply needed to be lit. I use to light my boiler by myself when I was kid....easiest thing ever. They did nothing but light the pilot light, nothing had to be replaced. They charged me $99.

My question is.....one......shouldn't the property management had this running before the tenant came in? 

Second, the tenant called this in without checking the boiler or even looking. Am I responsible for this? The boiler was perfectly functional.

Last, $99 for simply coming out. They said they would waive the fee if I had to fix or replace the boiler. 

Thoughts. Am I right to think this is outrageous? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,309
Posts
2,052
Votes
Matthew Olszak
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
2,052
Votes |
1,309
Posts
Matthew Olszak
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

@Edward Brewington

You'll have a difficult road ahead using a PM with this mindset. The solution might only take 2 minutes to fix a problem, but what about the time the office staff took to receive the complaint, then enter it in the system, then communicate with maintenance staff and dispatch them, then for that person to drive out there, fix it, report back, then for the office staff to enter the result. And the overhead/insurance/payroll/tax cost for those folks.

Good luck getting anyone to show up at your property reliably for under $100. They are charging you the minimum it makes sense to simply show up whether an issue exists or not.

And no, the tenant shouldn't be expected to troubleshoot a non-working boiler. 

  • Matthew Olszak
  • [email protected]
  • 847-447-6824
  • Loading replies...