It took them weeks to send out the letters and I don’t think they ever did as I didn’t receive a SINGLE call from any of the alleged mailings.

If you were alleged to be in violation of the laws, you would get sued by the Feds (like Trump and his father did in the 70's: https://www.politico.com/blogs...).With AFFH, they sought to add teeth to this, and go after cities, specifically nice suburbs, and it was really guilty until proven innocent.

I expect a court filing first thing monday morning, alleging that Trump overstepped his authority.

He has also (somehow) built up (allegedly) 6 figures in unpaid utility bills.

I’ll go with a wholesaler, since you won’t answer my original question for me to know for sure (or as for sure as can be alleged by someone for social media purposes.)If you are a wholesaler, I believe your calls to originate without there being a listing for sale/prior relationship with the “seller.”

Her reaction was expected but I just do not think any family will want to do business with her with the allegations out there. 

The day AFTER the sale he searched Prothy and found out that in the 1930s, this place was a gas station and the original steel USTs were leaking into the ground water and aquafer and causing alleged medical issues for the surround neighbors who had filed a lawsuit. 

After an investigation the allegations of forgery were proved up and if the "owner didn't want to sell the property to the Insured, the Insured received his/her loss recoverable under the policy.In some areas of the country you can buy a title policy that will protect you from future forgeries, they cost more but if you're really concerned look into it. https://www.firstam.com/title/homebuilder/norcal/new-homebuyer/resources/eagle-owners-policy.html#:~:text=First%20American%20Title%20Insurance%20Company%E2%80%99s%20EAGLE%20Owner%E2%80%99s%20Policy,levels%20of%20protection%20available%20to%20our%20California%20homeowners

What do you allege against the unknown heirs?

If the first applicant is in a protected class, it could be alleged that the reason you rented to the second applicant is because you were illegally discriminating against the first.