data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5d778/5d7788cdf189a81635b006a3b2d0c3b78f47ab29" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 23 replies
I'd underwrite the property, with that low interest rate assumable mortgage, to cash flow positively from day 1 as a long-term rental, but be willing and able to use the rent by the room strategy or to rent out part of the property as a Short Term Rental to dramatically increase cash flow during my occupancy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a8a0/0a8a00ac3d76668efe19a2c01ad78ac54d82e821" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 13 replies
@Robert StephensonYou’re in a great position!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2904/f29045d1c2d973120cd29ebc97bda3d766565ea5" alt=""
23 February 2025 | 42 replies
Again I am not advocating for this company and each person needs to do their own DD, all I am saying is I appreciated someone seeing something, calling me on it and having a conversation about it. if @Cheryl Abram lost 100% of her investment then these must not be first position loans.. as even if a rehab fix and flip fails you still have SOME value in the assset its not nothing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd99f/bd99fd7a00de7f2c9dce934aabc0fd3d7b6c33c8" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 9 replies
Look for the positive in all situations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0eb10/0eb10ed599416a2ae9353e62957d1d5b057b3563" alt=""
19 January 2025 | 42 replies
Multiple professional references, when addressing this issue, carefully state: "the IRS position is..." - which to me indicates the same doubts that I have about the legality of the IRS position.Until the IRS is challenged in court over this position and loses, I choose to comply with their position.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50d47/50d47034e815ab0efce4631c98a7753340024c6a" alt=""
16 January 2025 | 8 replies
As rental rates increase, cash flow becomes strongly positive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fbca/6fbca27399e62df474a8190279dd2991bd0de0b2" alt=""
14 January 2025 | 10 replies
This creates a negative initial position.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4260b/4260b60f904045776a771cd921f43b31e75ef083" alt=""
21 January 2025 | 6 replies
You can still easily find the 1% rule and positive cash flow and there's amazing appreciation potential.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6de96/6de963f713cb4deaf944e22e72d7c1e4ae087e13" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 14 replies
that we’ve learned in our 24 years, managing almost 700 doors across the Metro Detroit area, including almost 100 S8 leases:Class A Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, 3-5 years for positive cashflow, but you get highest relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% the more recent norm.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 680+ (roughly 5% probability of default), zero evictions in last 7 years.Class B Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, decent amount of relative rent & value appreciation.Vacancy Est: Historically 10%, 5% should be applied only if proper research done to support.Tenant Pool: Majority will have FICO scores of 620-680 (around 10% probability of default), some blemishes, but should have no evictions in last 5 yearsClass C Properties:Cashflow vs Appreciation: Typically, high cashflow and at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7656/a76568ead9af0df5b6943b9ca8c829156c4468ec" alt=""
15 January 2025 | 15 replies
& thank you especially for the positive affirmation, Collin!