If you state "No commercial activity of any kind" and you let someone operate a home office in their unit no harm no foul.

So, they couldn't try to 'get the deal for less/more' as it would harm the other party.

Risking other people's money might be ok however I wouldn't do so without the money person having enough exoerience and expertise to keep you both out of harms way. 

The other option is to include an addendum in your original purchase and sale agreement, where you have an out with no harm done on either parties side.

If you pay for this, you'd be setting yourself up to get hosed (pun intended) It will cost you waaaaayy more than you think and you'd be harming the environment because they'll be wasteful with their water use.Were doing the opposite : B/C our buildings only have one meter, We implemented a RUBS water billing system (google it) per occupant and now each tenant pays their fair share.

Fast forward a year and a half later, and now I seem to have hit a "quarter life crisis" where I'm having difficulty accepting office jobs that appear to have no life and no substance to them.

No harm in learning.

It seems that his fear of Obama is getting worse, and I am afraid that harm might come to some of your fellow socialist brothers.

No harm no foul let her out If she is late or ever is I start the eviction the first day legally possible 

I still have some problems which I am going to deal with next year which either cause me tear up my concrete slab in my carport or have them put down the same type of substance that I see AFS uses to lift the slab.Hope this provides some insight.