Correctness and completeness, substance over form, and other fun accounting terms would be my argument.But my opinion as to why shopping for a new tax pro wouldn't be a bad idea was a matter of carelessness and lack of due diligence, not necessarily an incorrect tax return.

There is no business reason to do this and possibly will not pass IRS' economic substance doctrine. 

They would essentially salvage structure and tear down structure that cannot be used and then cleaning everything with some sort of baking powder substance. 

Because the substance is cooked, its vapors can also cause accumulation in the ducts and air handler.

That, coupled with lack of working capital and a poor business plan saw my business dive and only a stubborn lack of acceptance of the facts has kept me afloat.I don't see property investment as a get-rich-quick scheme and I certainly don't believe the rubbish out there that makes all kinds of promises with no substance.

Both books are full of practical real world information, as opposed to the 10% substance, 90% rah-rah-rah-you-can-do-it formula that you get with a lot of books on real estate investing.

Trolled the thread and added nothing of substance to it.

The successful bidder was initially delighted to find the Maserati in the garage, once owned by the former house owner who had a substance abuse (aka "living better thru chemistry") problem. 

I have a potential tenant with bad credit and a spouse with a criminal history (possession of a controlled substance, evading arrest and driving without a valid drivers license, however, they want to pay the whole year's rent upfront.

If verbal you have nothing of substance really.