Right now there's huge concentration, but as this continues to build out and we see north of the high 30s GW by 10 years from now it'll be almost a requirement to keep some type of locality based risk assessment and to diversify. 

We all know about the shiny object syndrome or at least we have heard of it. 

If you’re self managing and personally moving and wish to keep self managing in your new location. 

If you believe your property’s assessed value is too high, you have the right to challenge it.

If I invested in FL, CA, AZ, NV, I'd probably have a different opinion, but warmer climate still doesn't mitigate the liability and maninenace objections.

Absent them, risk is controllable over time.I self manage a SFH in the Bay Area in a very pro-tenant city (some cities are a little less pro-tenant than others).

They can't assess all the subjective data like overall layout, view from the living room window, the dogs next door that bark all day, the width of doorways, size of individual rooms, quality of kitchen cabinets and appliances, etc.The best thing to do is study your market regularly.

The objective is to upsell to a master mind program or the artificial intelligence datasets, which also have zero response rate.

I 100% agree on self managing.

With the increased competition, it’s crucial to prepare your property to stand out and work to address obvious buyer objections prior to going on market.